Fate vs. Free Will
Hello my dear friends -
I spent the one-year anniversary of my trip to Oahu for LOST's Season Six Sunset on the Beach premiere in another sunny, warm place: Miami. I was there to support my friend Miss M, who ran the ING Half-Marathon. Longtime LLL readers might remember Miss M from some of my earliest posts, as she was who I'd stay with in NYC when I was working for The Man and out east every other week. In particular, she was the one whose DVR -- ones of the nights I was crashing at her place -- neglected to tape the Season One episode where Boone died/Aaron was born, and she subsequently feared for her life. Needless to say, time heals all wounds and we're still friends.
On my flight back to Chicago, I had a great time reminiscing about this:
Only to be met with this upon my return:
The Island couldn't have felt further away.
Then I struggled with what to write about for my first true post-LOST LLL entry. There were so many great ideas mentioned in my call for submissions last month; I didn't know how to narrow them down. Well, actually, there were a couple of topics I took off the table immediately: anything having solely to do with Season Six or The End. I will certainly write about the last season and the series finale again at some point, but my Mother of All Posts took care of the vast majority of thoughts I have on those subjects for now.It ended up being a few coming-soon movies that inspired this post: The Adjustment Bureau (out March 4) and Source Code (out April 1), as well as a comment from LLL reader "Ms." who suggested that it would be fun to revisit some of the earliest mysteries of the series. As you might remember, for the past three years (and because of this little ol' blog) I've been a film critic for redbox. While I'm not allowed to publicly give my opinion on any film before it's out (Damon Lindelof can, though), I will say that both TAB and SC revolve heavily around one of LOST's central themes: Fate vs. Free Will. The Adjustment Bureau even throws in a third element, Chance. TAB 's about a couple who wants to be together but is informed by mysterious bowler-hat-wearing dudes that their relationship is "not part of The Plan." Source Code follows an agent who keeps reliving eight disastrous minutes over and over... until he tries to change what happens (despite being warned that doing so is impossible). Extremely LOST-ish, yes?
These movies got me thinking (again) about what I still consider to be some of the most important questions our favorite TV show asked: Are our paths in life predetermined? Can you control your own destiny? How much of the future is already set in stone by a higher power?
Ready? Let's discuss. I'll start by saying that I don't think there are straight-up black-and-white answers to the questions above, nor do I think LOST's creative team was intentionally trying to take one side over the other. But I'll offer up my thoughts anyway. To get things going, I want to revisit the first season's finale (Exodus, Part 2) -- and specifically one of my favorite scenes of all time:
LOCKE: ...Do you really think all this is an accident -- that we, a group of strangers survived, many of us with just superficial injuries? Do you think we crashed on this place by coincidence -- especially, this place? We were brought here for a purpose, for a reason, all of us. Each one of us was brought here for a reason.
JACK: Brought here? And who brought us here, John?
LOCKE: The Island. The Island brought us here. This is no ordinary place, you've seen that, I know you have. But the Island chose you, too, Jack. It's destiny.
[And then a few lines later...]
JACK: I don't believe in destiny.
LOCKE: Yes, you do. You just don't know it yet.
[CHILLS!]
So now that it's all said and done, what do we think? Were the 815ers destined to crash on the Island?
If I had to give a short answer, it would be "Yes." But of course a short answer doesn't do this monumental question justice -- it's waaaay more complicated than a simple one-word response.
Before I write anything else, let me admit that "The 815ers were meant to crash" is one of those things I just like to believe and don't necessarily have a 100% airtight case for. Since I'm assuming you'd appreciate it if I at least attempted to back up my stance, however... what follows is my reasoning.

How exactly did Jacob understand what (and who) The Island wanted? That knowledge was part of what came along with drinking the enchanted dirty water his mom gave him when she passed on the proverbial torch. (Jacob transferred this same power to Jack... who handed it over to Hurley.)
At all costs, The Island needed its Light to keep burning. I always interpreted The Light as a representation of everything that is good in the world -- knowledge, love, friendship, empathy, truth, etc. Without the Light, the Island -- and, in turn, the world -- could be destroyed, be it by the MIB or other forces/people who might not have even truly comprehended what they'd stumbled upon (Widmore, anyone?). When Jack went into the cave to "reboot" everything after the MIB was defeated, we saw the skeletons of several others -- hinting that this good vs. evil battle had been repeated over and over again for a long, long time.

That brings us to the matter of Fate vs. Free Will. Did any of the 815ers -- or any other character on the Island, for that matter -- ever have a chance of altering his or her destiny? Was their main purpose in life to play the role they played to keep the Island safe? The Jughead experiment would lead us to believe so. A ton of LOST fans (myself included) had assumed that Faraday's plan might have made it possible for the 815 survivors and their friends to change the past -- to skip going to the Island all together. To be sure, most of us hoped that the first five seasons wouldn't be totally erased... we figured that there could be some sort of space-time shift to allow a new present/future course for our beloved characters that would still keep some of their Island experiences intact. But that didn't happen. "Whatever happened, happened" was reinforced when the Jughead explosion failed to reset the timeline... but should we interpret this to mean "You can't escape your destiny? Free will is a farce!"

You can apply this same logic to almost (key word) any character's story arc. Character A needed to realize X on his/her own in order to eventually do Y and Z... which led to Character B doing this and that... which averted the Island's destruction. The web of characters needing each other to achieve their ultimate destinies is extremely complex, but I'm sure at least one mega-nerd has it mapped out somewhere online. While I don't think I'll ever be able to take on such a huge task, I do foresee revisiting this idea of the connections between characters -- and the domino effect of their individual actions -- that resulted in saving the Island.

Did the fact that Jack's destiny was to save the Island mean that his father's life was also impacted in order to lead Jack down the necessary path?
Deep thoughts, people! Deep, deep thoughts.

My issue lies with the fact that Hurley was one of the only characters that fate seemed to be trying to STOP from boarding Oceanic 815 in the first place... yet he ended up being the Island Protector. How does that work? How does that fit in with the Destiny argument?


I'm going to choose to end this post here in order to actually get it published, because it's already a few weeks later than I'd hoped. But I can't wait to hear everyone's thoughts on the Free Will vs. Fate debate. Please continue to leave other Mailbag topic ideas in the comments, too... I never can tell exactly what will inspire a post, so the more suggestions, the better. I'm figuring I'll be back with the next post by the end of March.
SOME OTHER LOST-RELATED TIDBITS FOR YOU
- My dear friend and fellow blogger JOpinionated is holding the Coolest. LOST Giveaway. Ever... all in support of a worthy cause that's close to her heart. The details are here, and the deadline to enter is March 1. We've talked a lot about Oceanic Flight 815 in this post -- wouldn't it be cool to OWN A PIECE OF IT? Signed by Jorge "Hurley" Garcia, to boot???
- Did you hear that Michael "Ben" Emerson is going to star in one of LOST creator J.J. Abrams' new shows? And Jorge's in another?
- Did you hear that the TV series Emerson and Terry "Locke" O'Quinn were supposed to co-star in has now been delayed? (BOO HISS.)
- Speaking of Locke, I have to share a short and funny story. A fellow name GH, who wanted to surprise his wife LH -- a longtime LLL fan who was planning to read my book -- with with a personalized bookplate from me, had this to say when he sent in his email request, "Don't want to tell you what you can't do by saying what to write... so I'll leave that up to you." Locke would approve.
- And finally, I feel the need to point this out because it didn't hit me until months after I'd seen the Academy Award-nominated film Winter's Bone: The guy who plays the strung-out uncle is Lennon -- Dogen's little friend from the Temple in Season Six (real name: John Hawkes). WHAT?!?! He looks totally different in the movie. But congrats to him, because he's been nominated for Best Supporting Actor.
Hope you enjoyed the first of my post-LOST ramblings! And here's a special shout-out to LLL reader PN from Helsinki -- my publisher forwarded me your handwritten note -- loved it. Many thanks!
Until next time,
- e